The Archaic Anarchism of Herbert Read
'Red Landscape' by Graham Sutherland (1942)
I’ve been picking my way through Herbert Read’s poetry and flicking through his only novel, The Green Child (1935). As I have found with John Cowper Powys, I feel a sort of magnetism towards not just his work but the totality of his craft, his ideas, him as a person. Despite the imperfections of his poetry and prose (his non-fiction writing I have yet to read), there is an underlying set of ideas, images and a sense of character I can connect with. His Vitalist philosophy, his dislike of culture being separated and elevated from society, but also the many contradictions of his personality place him in a lineage of anarchist thinkers/artists (same thing) particular to the British Isles.
Whilst in many senses a Cosmopolitan, helping to bring Surrealism
to Britain from continental Europe, there is also apparent in his work a deep
adoration of locality. The plot of The Green Child sees its protagonist,
Olivero, return to his home village in England after faking his assassination
as president of the fictional South American republic of Roncador. This return
is framed as significant as he finds the stream that crosses the village
flowing backwards; returning to its source. His homecoming is, in a way,
a confrontation with his very self, something he couldn’t achieve playing
president in Roncador, as he states shortly before his assassination, “Try as I
would, I could not solve my personal problem in social terms” (Read, 1969: 119).
Similarly, his poem ‘Moon’s Farm’ (1951), originally
broadcast on radio, sees a traveller returning to his homeland. Whilst the landscape has
undergone great changes throughout modernity, its genius loci remains
“But what happened to the trees?
there was even a stunted orchard
All gone.
All signs of human habitation
rubbed off the landscape.
And yet
there is still something. I still feel
the spirit of the place.”
there was even a stunted orchard
All gone.
All signs of human habitation
rubbed off the landscape.
And yet
there is still something. I still feel
the spirit of the place.”
(Read, 1955: 37-38)
Consisting mainly of a philosophical dialogue between three
voices, working through subjects such as life, modernity and meaning, they
conclude that
It is when we look into the abyss of nothingness
infinite nothingness
that we lose courage
and die swearing
or die praying.
Yes: men should hold on to tangible things.
Stay with me in these hills and glens
where the birds cry lovingly to their young
and the waters are never silent.
infinite nothingness
that we lose courage
and die swearing
or die praying.
Yes: men should hold on to tangible things.
Stay with me in these hills and glens
where the birds cry lovingly to their young
and the waters are never silent.
(Read, 1955: 74-75)
Origins play an important role in Read’s work, they are the
foundation of his Vitalist philosophy. At the Origin is something that
transcends and overshadows all of the time that follows, a spirit which
encapsulates all of life, of which imagination and creativity is an essential
part. His high valuation of creativity, especially in the individual, serves as
a justification for his Anarchist politics. However, as demonstrated above, this
transcendental quality is tempered by a reverence of “tangible things”, giving
his philosophy a materialist underpinning.
This strange combination of reverence for the local and particular,
animated by some abstract universal force, is there in Powys’ work too;
consider the enthralling, yet utterly bamboozling, first line of A Glastonbury
Romance (1933)
“At the striking of noon on a certain fifth of March, there occurred
within a causal radius of Brandon railway station and yet beyond the deepest
pools of emptiness between the uttermost stellar systems one of those
infinitesimal ripples in the creative silence of the First Cause which always
occur when an exceptional stir of heightened consciousness agitates any living
organism in this astronomical universe.” (Powys, 1975: 21)
The local and tangible serves as a sort of anchor and source
of meaning to humans who can too easily gaze into the sublime terror of the
abyss. There is an underlying pessimism here in this recourse to place and
locality, the relinquishment of the modernist project of transcendence. This is
a small-c conservative Anarchism (side note: Read identified as a conservative
in his youth), which values the wisdom of the past whilst also looking towards
the future. It draws inspiration from the archaic and the anthropological (as
well as paying close attention to developments in psychology), but also seeking
to achieve some sort of social progress in the dismantling of hierarchical
structures.
Personally, I don’t completely align myself with these views,
they are products of their time, informed by and contributing to intellectual
discussions long since forgotten. However, I do think there is a lot of value
in Read’s and Powys’ work which is relevant to discussions we are having today.
I will outline, specifically, exactly what I find valuable in later posts.
Books Mentioned:
Powys, J. C. (1975) A Glastonbury Romance, Picador.
Read, H. (1955) Moon's Farm and other poems, Faber.
Read, H. (1969) The Green Child, Penguin.
Comments
Post a Comment